Cases 71 - 80 of 105
In re: Isaiah Givens, Jr.
as 13-3726
Petitioner:
In re: ISAIAH J. GIVENS, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Givens v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-2098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GIVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Givens v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv00874
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Givens
Respondent:
J. Thomas, Harley Lappin and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIVENS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv00365
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GIVENS
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and DANIEL EDWARD FITZSIMMONS
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIVENS et al v. DUNMIRE et al
as 2:2011cv03137
Plaintiff:
TROY GIVENS, CLARENCE DALCOUR, ANDY PARKER and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION , FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and FEDEX HOME DELIVERY, INC.
Movant:
KEVIN HISCOX, RUSSELL JACKSON and RALPH CARL VEAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GIVEN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65591
Plaintiff:
JAMES F GIVEN and DORIS JEAN GIVEN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIVEN et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv64292
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. GIVEN and JANE GIBSON GIVEN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIVENS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2011cv02191
Plaintiff:
THEARTIS GIVENS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GIVEN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62561
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GIVEN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
