Cases 71 - 80 of 320
KEHL v. BOARDWALK 1000, LLC. et al
as 1:2020cv12397
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, HARD ROCK INTERNATIONAL, INC., JOHN/JANE SNOW ARCHITECT(S) and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY JOSEPH KEHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vorobyev v. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2020cv01384
Plaintiff:
Andrey Vorobyev
Defendant:
Laura Wolfe, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAVARRO v. ARCHER et al
as 1:2020cv07708
Defendant:
JANE ROE 1-10, JANE ROE 11-20, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO NAVARRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDERS-MOYE v. ZIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2020cv05608
Defendant:
ROBERT SMITH, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANC COMPANY, JANE ROE and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE F SANDERS-MOYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POLANCO v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv01761
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, COSTCO WHOLESALE, JANE ROE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
YENNYFER POLANCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VERGARA v. THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL et al
as 2:2020cv01668
Defendant:
THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL, JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
YESENIA VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VERGARA v. THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL et al
as 3:2020cv01668
Defendant:
THE RITZ CARLTON HOTEL, JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
YESENIA VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BECKNELL, JR. v. ASSAIDI et al
as 2:2020cv01590
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOE CORPORATION (1-10), JANE ROE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
GERARD BECKNELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
ARCE v. CEESAY et al
as 2:2020cv01179
Defendant:
ESURANCE (NJ), MUSA CEESAY, JANE ROE and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ARCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
SALAAM v. SINGH et al
as 2:2020cv00739
Plaintiff:
Ms. NAJAH A SALAAM
Defendant:
JANE ROE 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10, JOHN DOE CORPORATION 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
