Cases 71 - 80 of 410
HERNANDEZ v. ARIENE et al
as 2:2021cv20701
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
TIMOTY ARIENE and WARDEN MICHAEL RUSSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LENDE v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv20265
Plaintiff:
DASMANE LENDE
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ANTHONY CURETON, SGT. BLONCOURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINSON v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv20229
Plaintiff:
DELANO HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ANTHONY CURETON, SHERIFF LUIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Me et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv19396
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and JON ROE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DHS, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv19347
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GILLESPIE v. NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2021cv18990
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE GILLESPIE
Defendant:
NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION, ROGER LEONE, CHRISTOPHER CERF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSSO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv18409
Plaintiff:
ROBIN RUSSO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. MCELROY et al
as 2:2021cv17956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
LARRICK MCELROY, DEVOUGHN MOORE, GUSTAVO FRANCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv17234
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RUSSO
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GILLIAM v. CAVALLARO et al
as 1:2021cv16844
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. GILLIAM
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. CAVALLARO, NICHOLAS J. RUSSO, JACK MANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
