Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,515
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff: PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant: MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Telly Royster v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1698
Plaintiff: TELLY ROYSTER
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 24-1692
Petitioner: FRANCIS BOYD
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
BURTON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01579
Petitioner: LAFENUS BURTON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Rivello et al
as 5:2024cv01540
Petitioner: Patrick T. Hughes
Respondent: Superintendent JOHN A. RIVELLO, District Attorney of Northampton County and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff: Karel Blalock
Defendant: Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff: MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
MUHAMMAD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00548
Petitioner: MU'MIT MUHAMMAD and Keith Lamont Drain
Respondent: Superintendent Zaken, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CENTRE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Petitioner: MU'MIT MUHAMMAD and Keith Lamont Drain
Respondent: Superintendent Zaken, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00547
Petitioner: MU'MIT MUHAMMAD and KEITH LAMONT DRAIN
Respondent: Superintendent Zaken, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?