Cases 71 - 80 of 127
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 2:2014cv03096
Plaintiff:
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA , ST. JOHN'S ORPHAN ASYLUM , ST. EDMONDS HOME FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , THOMAS E. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marilyn Huertero v. USA, et al
as 14-2861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARILYN HUERTERO, Individually
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
David Zubik, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-1377
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOST REVEREND DAVID A. ZUBIK, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, as the Beneficial Owner of the Pittsburgh series of The Catholic Benefits Trust and CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of The Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Lawrence Persico, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-1376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MOST REVEREND LAWRENCE T. PERSICO, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE, A CHARITABLE TRUST, ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE, ST. MARTIN CENTER INC., AN AFFILIATE NONPROFIT CORPORATION OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ERIE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-1374
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Karen Tucker v. Secretary Health and Human Ser
as 14-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN E. TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary Department of Health, et al
as 13-3536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cecelia Taransky v. Secretary Department of Heath, et al
as 13-3483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECELIA A. TARANSKY, Indivudally and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
POHL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv00930
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL POHL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al v. LUPIN LIMITED
as 2:2013cv04039
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
