Cases 81 - 90 of 174
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WOLFE v. D.O.C. OFFICIALS et al
as 2:2015cv07626
Plaintiff:
DONNELL WOLFE
Defendant:
D.O.C. OFFICIALS and D.H.S. OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Arbor Material Handling, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00945
Plaintiff:
Donnell A. Young
Defendant:
Arbor Material Handling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'DONNELL et al v. COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2015cv07212
Plaintiff:
SUSAN O'DONNELL , SCOTT O'DONNELL , K.O. and others
Defendant:
COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL , COOPER HEALTH SERVICES, INC. , COOPER MEDICAL SCHOOL OF ROWAN UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv04928
Plaintiff:
CALVIN H. THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RUSHTON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI FRACKVILLE/MAHANOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. CARRAMUNCLE et al
as 2:2015cv04898
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
STEVE CARRAMUNCLE, COREY, DENNIS O'DONNEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ORMAN et al v. CITIMORTGAGE et al
as 2:2015cv03432
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. ORMAN and LESLIE E. ORMAN
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, CORY O'BRYANT, LATANYA M. BRIGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NOVOSEL et al v. O'DONNELL BROS. TRANSPORTS, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv03398
Plaintiff:
DAVID NOVOSEL and AMY NOVOSEL
Defendant:
O'DONNELL BROS. TRANSPORTS, INC. and PAUL MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PURPURA v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv03534
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, STEVEN M. SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
