Cases 81 - 90 of 14,156
In re Bioxcel Therapeutics, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith and Janice Korff
Defendant:
Vimel Mehta, Peter Mueller, June Bray and others
Miller v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jeremy G. Miller
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. County of Lancaster et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
County of Lancaster and Office of Open Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
RODRIGUEZ v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
ANDY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, TIM CARVER and CHRIS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Quattrociocchi
as 1:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Cindy Miller
Defendant:
Carol Lynn Quattrociocchi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LANG v. WILLIAM MILLER & SON TRASH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv23357
Plaintiff:
DENISE LANG
Defendant:
WILLIAM MILLER & SON TRASH, INC., WILLIAM MILLER AND SON TRASH REMOVAL, INC., WILLIAM MILLER & SON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BEY v. ERIE COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
TSABA BEY
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY POLICE DEPT., OFFICER ANTHONY ATTALLA and OFFICER ANDREW MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
