Cases 81 - 90 of 251
Gamble v. United States District Court of Delaware et al
as 1:2018cv00993
Defendant:
Post Office, Dover Delaware Capitol Building, United States Postal and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DUNKEN DONUTS et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
JOHN JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant:
DUNKEN DONUTS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and SIXTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gamble v. United States District Court of Rhode Island
as 1:2018cv00778
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Gamble
Defendant:
United States District Court of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv00747
Plaintiff:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEGROME D. DAVIS, PETRESE B. TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETER DIPIETRO LIVING TRUST v. POTUS et al
as 1:2017cv12280
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO LIVING TRUST
Defendant:
POTUS, SCOTUS, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
