Cases 1 - 10 of 13
KEIM v. VANZOEREN
as 5:2024cv02365
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
KEIM
as 2:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CALE v. KEIM LUMBER COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01763
Defendant:
KEIM LUMBER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL W. CALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LORD v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv02972
Defendant:
DAWN E BENT, JULIE SOCHALSKI, ROSEMARY C POLOMANO and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S LORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gritz v. Keim Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00589
Plaintiff:
David Gritz
Defendant:
Keim Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
KEIM, JR. v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00504
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, XYZ CORP. 1-10 and SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KEIM, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEIM v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv15693
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA A. KEIM
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donna Baltimore v. Harrisburg Parking Authority, et al
as 10-3153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA BALTIMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRISBURG PARKING AUTHORITY, MARK YOBBI, GAIL LEWIS and others
KIA v. IMAGING SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05611
Plaintiff:
OMID E. KIA
Defendant:
IMAGING SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., IMAGING SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, LLC, EDWARD J. MARANDOLA and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
