Cases 1 - 10 of 21,677
Blanca Sucuzhanay-Mendia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2059
Petitioner:
BLANCA AZUCENA SUCUZHANAY-MENDIA and N. F. S.-S.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
4301 N Delaware QOB LLC v. Selective Insurance Co of South Carolina
as 24-2005
Plaintiff:
4301 N DELAWARE QOB LLC
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE CO OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ULLOA GOMEZ et al v. GIRGIS
as 3:2024cv04602
Plaintiff:
RUDDY ULLOA GOMEZ and SANTIAGO GOMEZ
Defendant:
MONA N. GIRGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
WEST v. D'ANGELO et al
as 1:2024cv04363
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. WEST, JR.
Defendant:
TPR J. D'ANGELO, DSFC G. WREN, DET II M. RIBCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 299 N FEDERAL MASTER, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE SMITH
Defendant:
299 N FEDERAL MASTER, LLC, WHG PAYROLL, LLC, WURZAK HOTEL GROUP MARK LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
