Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Boynton v. Housenick
as 3:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Johnny Enrique Boynton
Defendant:
Jonathan Housenick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv20167
Plaintiff:
LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC.
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY and BOYNTON AND BOYNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP. v. WEEKES et al
as 3:2021cv17733
Plaintiff:
FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP.
Defendant:
BOYNTON WEEKES and GEORGE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYNTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv01632
Plaintiff:
LISA KELLY BOYNTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYNTON v. PUTMAN et al
as 3:2018cv09784
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BOYNTON
Defendant:
DAVID ALLEN PUTMAN, PENN COLOR, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franchi v. 8point3 Energy Partners LP et al
as 1:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
8point3 Energy Partners LP , Charles D. Boynton , Mark R. Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Benjamin Boynton, Jr.
as 17-3020
Petitioner:
In re: BENJAMIN BOYNTON, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY
Boynton v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2016cv00449
Petitioner:
Benjamin Boynton, Jr.
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP. v. WEEKES et al
as 3:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP.
Defendant:
BOYNTON WEEKES, GEORGE JACKSON, JEROME WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
