Cases 1 - 10 of 20
LIANG v. TENAFLY GOOD TASTE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
JUN LIANG
Defendant:
TENAFLY GOOD TASTE LLC doing business as GOOD TASTE CHINESE TAKE-OUT, QIAO ZHANG, BI JUAN SHI and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FOUNTAIN MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, LTD. v. CHEN
as 3:2019cv16214
Plaintiff:
FOUNTAIN MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
Defendant:
QIAO JOANNE JIANG CHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOUNTAIN MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, LTD. v. QIAO
as 2:2019cv16214
Defendant:
JOANNE JIANG CHEN QIAO
Plaintiff:
FOUNTAIN MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHIPLEY v. HUANG et al
as 2:2019cv00654
Defendant:
JACOB SPIDEL, QIAO HONG HUANG, JUDGE BRADLEY MOSS and others
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE SHIPLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LVP ASSOCIATES, LLC et al v. BANK OF CHINA, NEW YORK BRANCH et al
as 2:2018cv08493
Plaintiff:
LVP ASSOCIATES, LLC , 769 ASSOCIATES, LLC , PAUL V. PROFETA and others
Defendant:
BANK OF CHINA, NEW YORK BRANCH and RAYMOND L. QIAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Qiao Fang Ke v. Attorney General United State
as 17-1693
Petitioner:
QIAO FANG KE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ZHENG et al v. MING'S GOURMET GARDEN LLC et al
as 1:2014cv05396
Plaintiff:
WANG QIN ZHENG , WEN QING CHEN , XIAOQIAN ZHU and others
Defendant:
MING'S GOURMET GARDEN LLC, MING ZHU ZHANG, LI ZHONG CHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Xue Chen, et al v. Attorney General United State
as 13-2586
Petitioner:
XUE HUA CHEN and QIAO XIA YANG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Qiao Liu v. Attorney General United State
as 13-2198
Petitioner:
QIAO MIAO LIU
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01302
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
