Cases 1 - 10 of 6,589
JONES et al v. PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05006
Defendant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY #2266, DEF COMPANY DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CLEMENTE JONES and ANGELA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Uhler v. Carbondale Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv01590
Defendant:
The Hon. Sean McGraw, Officer Jessie Pruitt, Mayor Bannon and others
Plaintiff:
Branden Uhler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv09294
Petitioner:
JAMES EMORY JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2024cv04969
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
Bryant Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CANGE v. TUTU et al
as 3:2024cv09118
Defendant:
AKWASI OSEI, SANDRA DELAUDER, RENEE JONES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JONES v. CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES OF PITTSBURGH
as 2:2024cv01291
Defendant:
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES OF PITTSBURGH doing business as CONCORDIA OF THE SOUTH HILLS
Plaintiff:
Kristen Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
