Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
American Osteopathic Association et al
as 2:2020cv06540
Plaintiff:
DO Katrina Platt, DO Jody Bentley, American Osteopathic Association and others
Defendant:
American Board of Internal Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerard Kenney, et al v. American Board of Internal Med
as 20-1007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE MURRAY LEISURE, ALEXA JOSHUA, GERARD KENNEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
American Board of Internal Med v. Jaime Salas Rushford
as 19-2461
Not Yet Classified:
NAOMI P. O'GRADY, MD, JOAN M. VAN FELDT, MD, CHRISTINE K. CASSEL, M.D. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, MD and JAIME SALAS RUSHFORD, MD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
KENNEY et al v. AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
as 2:2018cv05260
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE MURRAY LEISURE, ALEXA JOSHUA, GERARD KENNEY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE v. JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, M.D.
as 2:2014cv06428
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Defendant:
JAMIE SALAS RUSHFORD, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.