Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,924
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Eric Johnson, et al v. David Mazie, et al
as 24-2056
Plaintiff: ERIC JOHNSON
Defendant: DAVID A. MAZIE, ADAM M. SLATER and MAZIE SLATER KATZ & FREEMAN LLC
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Plaintiff: CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Defendant: NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, DAMON J. NOTO, MD, SPINE & JOINT CENTER and others
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner: Juan Tiburcio
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Soria et al v. Briningstool et al
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff: Adam Soria and David Darrigan
Defendant: Tony Briningstool, Andy McQueen and John Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
SHAH v. ADAMS
as 2:2024cv07010
Plaintiff: PRATIK SHAH
Defendant: RYAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
USA v. John Adams
as 24-1975
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN ADAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant: ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff: BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant: R. SCOTT ADAMS, DOUGLAS SAMPLE, DEREK ARTIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?