Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
REUTEN ASSOCIATES LP et al v. CLOSTER BOROUGH et al
as 2:2024cv06615
Plaintiff:
REUTEN ASSOCIATES LP and JOHN AND JANE DOE(S) 1-10
Defendant:
CLOSTER BOROUGH, CLOSTER ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and JOSEPH BIANCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
East Ohio Capital LLC v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, et al
as 24-1453
Plaintiff:
EAST OHIO CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and LASHAWN M. BURTON FAULK, individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MATZLIACH et al v. TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Abraham Matzliach and Hana Matzliach
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON, NEW JERSEY and TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON, NEW JERSEY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARDENAS v. BUSINESS DEBT ADJUSTERS LLC
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
ERICA CARDENAS
Defendant:
BUSINESS DEBT ADJUSTERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
