Cases 1 - 10 of 676
MCLEAN v. ADVANCED AUTO PARTS et al
as 1:2023cv01973
Plaintiff:
Michael McLean
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Incorporated, ADVANCED AUTO PARTS, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
M.P.T. RACING, INC. v. BROTHERS RESEARCH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
M.P.T. Racing, Inc. dba MPT Industries and M.P.T. RACING, INC. doing business as MPT INDUSTRIES
Respondent:
Brothers Research Corporation and ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jewel Wigginton, et al v. Advance Auto Parts Inc, et al
as 20-8036
Respondent:
STARBOARD VALUE LP, WIGGINTON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, JEFFREY C. SMITH and others
Petitioner:
THOMAS OKRAY, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC and THOMAS R. GRECO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DiBattista v. Greco et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
Thomas R. Greco, John F. Bergstrom, Eugene I. Lee, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Mario DiBattista
Nominal Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ROSS v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00543
Defendant:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., POWERBUILT, INC., ADVANCE STORES COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
