Cases 1 - 10 of 206
Quarles v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Allan Quarles
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattucci v. Youngkin et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles Mattucci
Defendant:
Warden Youngkin, Mary Babbs, Nurse Caroline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyahla, Sr. v. Youngkin, Sr. et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Tyahla, Sr.
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Sr., Derrick George, John Gablick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Tristan Reed
as 23-1842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRISTAN AUBREY REED
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
JUSTICE, II v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, ANTHONY J BUZZELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
WHITE v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2021cv04163
Petitioner:
DAVID AUBREY WHITE
Respondent:
CHESTER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COOK v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv16142
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AUBREY COOK
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNBAR v. METLIFE, INC.
as 2:2021cv00745
Defendant:
METLIFE, INC.
Plaintiff:
AUBREY DUNBAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
