Cases 1 - 10 of 23
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
McKee v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Jamey McKee
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, L. Harry, G. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. Kramer et al
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
R. Kramer, J. Carter, J. Smolke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BUTLER v. PIERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
SERGEANT PIERSON, SERGEANT HEIDER, SERGEANT WADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGLE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
LT. SMITH, LT. FROEHLICH, CO1 GUYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Forbes v. Kozich et al
as 3:2021cv02115
Plaintiff:
Jordan Forbes
Defendant:
C.O. Kozich, C.O. Erdman, C.O. Testen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv20028
Petitioner:
RICHARD BLY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05402
Plaintiff:
LLOYD G. BLY, JR. and KATHLEEN M. BLY
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
