Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Reza Farzan v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 19-3925
Defendant / Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, SHEENA MCWILLIAMS, BETH COTTRELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REZA FARZAN
FARZAN v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 3:2019cv05156
Defendant:
STACY E. SPOHN, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
REZA FARZAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guinn et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04780
In Re:
PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Dale Guinn, Needham O. Bunn, Nancy L. Bunn and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HELM et al v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01136
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HELM , DEBORAH PRISE , HEATHER P. RADY and others
Defendant:
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC. and ALDERWOODS GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MATTHEWS et al v. ISBRANDTSEN CO., INC.
as 2:2011cv39186
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C MATTHEWS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
ISBRANDTSEN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv39187
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C MATTHEWS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MATTHEWS v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66551
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LESLIE C MATTHEWS et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv70845
Plaintiff:
LESLIE C MATTHEWS, LESLIE C MATTHEWS and MARGARET MATTHEWS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
