Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04326
Defendant: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and THE WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Petitioner: THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
In Re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Interested Party: THE KROGER CO and WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFT WORKERS LOCAL 1 HEALTH FUND v. CELGENE CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06997
Defendant: PHV STANLEY E. FISHER and CELGENE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, THE DETECTIVES' ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., David Mitchell and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and CITY OF PROVIDENCE
In Re: Thalomid and Revlimid Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund, Inc., et al v. Navient Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00112
Defendant: Navient Corporation, Barry A. Munitz, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago, George A. Menold, Lord Abbett Equity Trust - Lord Abbett Calibrated Mid Cap Value Fund and others
Petitioner: Employees' Retirement System of the City of Providence, Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust and The City of Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
THE ALARIS GROUP, INC. v. ALARIS HEALTH, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv09801
Plaintiff: THE ALARIS GROUP, INC.
Defendant: ALARIS HEALTH, LLC, SUB ACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER AT KEARNY, LLC, PALISADES OPERATIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2017cv05058
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEED et al v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02817
Plaintiff: DAVID HEED
Movant: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 PENSION FUND , TEAMSTERS LOCAL 456 ANNUITY FUND , LABOURERS' PENSION FUND OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN CANADA and others
Defendant: UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC , ALAN B. MILLER and STEVE FILTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. ALLERGAN PLC et al
as 2:2016cv04308
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant: ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PLC, LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND v. RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01621
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND
Defendant: RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER GROUP, PLC and INDIVIDIOR, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. CELGENE CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01605
Plaintiff: CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant: CELGENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?