Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wilhelm v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Wheeler v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Raymond Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI
as 23-2893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND CRAIG JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 23-2625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JON REILLY and others
Johnson v. Barrazza
as 3:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Raymond Craig Johnson
Respondent:
Barrazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawrence v. La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company et al
as 1:2022cv01032
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, Kevin Tang, Larry Edwards and others
Johnson v. Gibson
as 3:2022cv00640
Petitioner:
Raymond Craig Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Gibson
as 3:2022cv00641
Petitioner:
Raymond Craig Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevin Potter, et al v. David Newkirk, et al
as 19-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CARELLA, SHARRON BURNETT, JACKIE READ and others
Not Yet Classified:
DELMARVA ENTERPRISE
POTTER et al v. NEWKIRK et al
as 1:2017cv08478
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
