Cases 1 - 10 of 43
BARBREY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16659
Plaintiff:
FRANCES BARBREY and THE ESTATE OF FRANCIS CARPER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Easley v. Vogt et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Warren Easley
Defendant:
Lt. Vogt, Unit Manager Miller, Sgt. Carper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJuan Thornton-BeyIn re: DeJuan Thornton-Bey
as 23-2057
Petitioner:
In re: DEJUAN B. THORNTON-BEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN D. CHRISTENSEN, C.O. B. FOGLEMAN and others
Thornton-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01790
Plaintiff:
DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden D. Christensen, C.O. B. Fogleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Selmon v. Carper et al
as 3:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Selmon
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Carper, Warden FNU Quay, Capt. FNU Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Coons, et al.
as 1:2021cv00859
Defendant:
Tom Carper, U.S. Congress and Chris Coons
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REIMER v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 2:2021cv10997
Defendant:
BEN SASSE, SUSAN COLLINS, MIKE ROUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J REIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gilmore v. Quay et al
as 4:2021cv00198
Defendant:
Mr. Duran, C.O. Fry, Mr. Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Tyganda Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthew Jones v. Thomas Carper
as 19-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
THOMAS R. CARPER
Jones v. Carper
as 1:2018cv01383
Defendant:
U.S. Senator Tom Carper
Plaintiff:
Matthew N.P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
