Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HENRY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv22056
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENRY, LINDA HENRY and THE ESTATE OF LINDA HENRY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castillo v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv01979
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Castillo
Respondent:
Warden David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castillo v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv01550
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Castillo
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Castillo v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv00911
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Castillo
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIERER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64861
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENRY SIERER and BETTY SIERER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOWLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv01341
Plaintiff:
NELSON FOWLER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA POLICE COMMISSIONER CHARLES H. RAMSEY , CHARLES HENRY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIEBERT v. STANDARD INSULATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60587
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENRY SIEBERT
Defendant:
STANDARD INSULATIONS, INC. , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv64291
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA DAWES and CHARLES HENRY DAWES
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CALHOUN v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv61528
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENRY CALHOUN
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
