Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CAIN et al v. KENNEDY
as 2:2021cv05598
Plaintiff:
MEGAN CAIN and JUSTIN CAIN
Defendant:
CHRISTINA KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAIN et al v. KENNEDY
as 2:2021cv05604
Plaintiff:
MEGAN CAIN and JUSTIN CAIN
Defendant:
CHRISTINA KENNEDY
3Rd Party Defendant:
Dan Ratz and DR CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv17405
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA KENNEDY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT OF 0.02 ACRES + IN DURHAM TOWNSHIP, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 11-005-121-002 et al
as 5:2018cv00522
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT ROAD EASEMENT OF 0.02 ACRES + IN DURHAM TOWNSHIP, BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 11-005-121-002, JEFFREY & CHRISTINA KENNEDY PORTER and AND ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Frederick Torrence v. Shelly Thompson, et al
as 10-4106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK M. TORRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLY LEE THOMPSON, RECORDS SUPERVISOR AT SCI FOREST, JEFFREY BEARD, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, RAYMOND SOBINA, SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI FOREST and others
ROSADO v. DOE et al
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
JERONIMO ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JON DOE, ROGER S. VIRGIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARKNESS v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE HARKNESS
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, MICHAEL BARONE, CHRISTINA KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Hankins v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC ARMEL, JEFFREY BEARD, ROBERT BITNER and others
Defendant:
MARSH, H. CLIFFORD O'HARA, KECK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
