Cases 1 - 10 of 4,369
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
TRI-STATE DELIVERY, INC. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
TRI-STATE DELIVERY, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Malik Williams
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANDY v. NORDO et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HANDY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE PHILIP NORDO, DETECTIVE OHMARR JENKINS, DETECTIVE GREGORY SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
