Cases 1 - 10 of 47
CLAUDIO v. PENSCHICHEN et al
as 5:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
ROBERT CLAUDIO
Respondent:
DAVID PENSCHICHEN, MS. JANE DOE and GEORGE NASSIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04841
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIZARRO et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2022cv03675
Plaintiff:
Glenda Pizarro and Claudio Pizarro
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART EAST, LP, WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Morales et al v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Claudio Morales, 1, Kyle Kammer, Dwight L. Clarke and others
Defendant:
HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., SATTAR SHAIK, Harvest Associates Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
SYSCO PHILADELPHIA, LLC v. SILVA
as 2:2020cv06182
Plaintiff:
SYSCO PHILADELPHIA, LLC
Defendant:
CLAUDIO SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BERTI v. AIRBNB, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv03686
Defendant:
LUNA BARAKAT and AIRBNB, INC.
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO BERTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENNELL et al v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERKLEY, KENNETH SERNOBLE, GABRIEL LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GOLDY, LIEUTENANT HENNINGER, CAPTAIN MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRERA v. MOSER
as 3:2019cv00032
Petitioner:
CLAUDIO HERRERA
Respondent:
V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAGOA v. QUAKERTOWN VETERINARY CLINIC
as 2:2018cv00731
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO LAGOA
Defendant:
QUAKERTOWN VETERINARY CLINIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
