Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILA, POLICE DEPT ET AL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv06293
Plaintiff: DAMON JOHNSON
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILA, POLICE DEPT ET AL, POLICE OFFICER SOLOMON, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sentinel Connector Systems, Inc. v. NSI Industries, LLC. et al
as 1:2026cv02220
Plaintiff: Sentinel Connector Systems, Inc.
Defendant: NSI Industries, LLC., NSI Holdings, LLC., Sentinel Capital Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
IN RE: DAMON HUNTER ROBINS
as 2:2026cv05586
Plaintiff: DAMON HUNTER ROBINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Dominick Howard
as 26-2850
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DOMINICK TYREE HOWARD, a/k/a JASON DAMON TAYLOR
Damon JonesIn re: Damon Jones
as 26-2693
Petitioner: In re: DAMON JONES, PADRP
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Carey v. USA
as 1:2026cv01755
Petitioner: Damon Todd Carey
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04198
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)2(a) Family and Medical Leave Act
Oakley v. USA
as 3:2026cv01491
Petitioner: Damone D. Oakley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MURPHY v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2026cv03768
Petitioner: DAMON MURPHY
Respondent: BRADLEY BOOHER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NICHOLS v. ASH et al
as 1:2026cv05014
Plaintiff: DAMON NICHOLS
Defendant: JESSE ASH, EVERETT MILES, CHRISTINE NORBUT BEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?