Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SERGIO DAVID v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2021cv03620
Defendant:
BLACK HORSE CARRIERS INC., XYZ CORP (fictitious corporation, fictitious UM/UIM and/or PIP carrier, and/or employer of defendant), DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
SERGIO DAVID, as General Administrator, And as Administrator ad Prosequendum of the ESTATE OF WILLIAM DAVID and DAVID SERGIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2019cv00360
Defendant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, VLADIMIR MECHKOVA and others
Plaintiff:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Daniel Rodriguez
as 17-3835
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
MALDONADO et al v. CITY OF PASSAIC BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2017cv12245
Plaintiff:
EDDIE MALDONADO, JR. and ANDREW NAZARIO
Defendant:
CITY OF PASSAIC BOARD OF EDUCATION, PASSAIC PUBLIC SCHOOLS, PABLO MUNOZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v USA
as 1:2016cv01500
Defendant:
Daniel Rodriguez and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2016cv00943
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Ebbert
as 1:2015cv00157
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Daniel Rodriguez
as 14-1203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Francisco et al v. Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2012cv00699
Plaintiff:
Alvarado Alfarfo Miguel Francisco , Edgar Arroyo Gonzalez , Marcelo Corea Corea and others
Defendant:
Dow Chemical Company , Occidental Chemical Corporation , Shell Oil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2012cv03207
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ROBERT DAMMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
