Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Ransom et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
Darnell Williams
Respondent:
Superintendent Ransom, Attorney General Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. MARQUEZ et al
as 1:2020cv17464
Defendant:
SERGIO MARQUEZ, VAN DU LEE, OFFICER M. LOATMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv02866
Petitioner:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darnell Williams v. Kate Barkman, et al
as 14-1994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATE BARKMAN, Director, Clerk of Court Records
WILLIAMS v. BARKMAN et al
as 2:2013cv01805
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KATE BARKMAN and UNKNOWN CLERKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Darnell Williams v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 10-4585
Petitioner:
In re: DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, Superintendent SCI Mercer, DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
WILLIAMS v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2010cv01502
Petitioner:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRIAN H. THOMPSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. CLINE et al
as 3:2009cv04988
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TROY CLINE, WARREN TWP POLICE DEPT and OTHER WARREN TWP POLICE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv68044
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. STOWITZKY et al
as 2:2007cv01157
Petitioner:
DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PAUL J. STOWITZKY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
