Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Quintez Talley, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Gramont et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gramont, Patti Gran, Jillian Gray and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Quintez Talley v. Timothy Mazzocca, et al
as 19-2309
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
TALLEY v. MAZZOCCA et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 3:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Rodney Chism, David Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2018cv00879
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Daniel Myers, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Attorney General's Office, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, RODNEY CHISM, DAVID LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Graffus et al
as 3:2016cv01666
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Proctor
Defendant:
C.O. Graffus, Sgt. Grassmyer, Lt. Lusk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
