Cases 1 - 10 of 28
RAWLS v. GUYTON et al
as 2:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Defendant:
MICHAEL GUYTON, MR. GIBBS, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sameech Rawls v. Gibbs, et al
as 22-2101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. GIBBS, Kitchen Staff Member, SCI Greene, MICHAEL GUYTON, Unit Manager, SCI Greene, ROBERT GILMORE, Facility Manager, SCI Greene and others
HALL v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv01431
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, Lt. T. A. LEWIS, LUKACHYK and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONT HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henry Baynard v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-1383
Defendant:
CANAY, HENRY, BURKOVICH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY BAYNARD
BAYNARD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05459
Defendant:
JERRY ANKROM, GENA CLARK, MICHAEL BURTON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY BAYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sameech Rawls v. Gibbs, et al
as 19-1518
Defendant / Appellee:
GIBBS, Kitchen Staff Member, SCI Greene, MICHAEL GUYTON, Unit Manager, SCI Greene, ROBERT GILMORE, Facility Manager, SCI Greene and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMEECH RAWLS
GRAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01414
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and STEPHEN DURCO
Plaintiff:
HEATH W. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VO v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01364
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and Captain STEPHEN DURCO
Plaintiff:
THOY VO and THUY VO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PELINO v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01232
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, Captain STEPHEN DURCO, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
VITO A. PELINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MILLER et al
as 2:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Defendant:
MILLER, JENKINS, MCGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
