Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $634,778.69 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 393883753, HELD IN THE NAME OF SUPREME STATE LLC
as 2:2024cv07268
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$7,571.49 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN FIDELITY BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 7896, HELD IN THE NAME OF BVP LOGISTICS, INC., $634,778.69 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 393883753, HELD IN THE NAME OF SUPREME STATE LLC and $11,807.08 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 0172, HELD IN THE NAME OF SKYER USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
First Fidelity Bank v. Temenos U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
First Fidelity Bank
Defendant:
Temenos U.S.A., Inc. and Temenos Cloud Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARTWRIGHT v. FIDELITY BANK et al
as 2:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
KAREN W. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
FIDELITY BANK , RICHARD SPENCER and ANTHONY ROCCO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00589
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SCHAULTS v. KUBIK et al
as 2:2011cv01340
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BRADFORD SCHAULTS
Defendant:
DAVID L. KUBIK and FIDELITY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HICKS v. THE CADLE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010mc00365
Plaintiff:
KERRY R. HICKS
Defendant:
THE CADLE COMPANY, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD., WILLIAM E. SHAULIS and others
Garnishee:
CITIZENS BANK OF EVANS CITY, COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF PA, GREAT AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN and others
STEWART v. FIDELITY BANK
as 2:2007cv00485
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE A. STEWART
Defendant:
FIDELITY BANK, FIDELITY BANK and FIDELITY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
