Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SERVICE ZERO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES et al v. WVR PAYMENTS COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv02831
Plaintiff:
SERVICE ZERO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES and TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
WVR PAYMENTS COMPANY, BANK OF AMERICA, WELLS FARGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arunachalam v. Gordon et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
Edward L. Tulin, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BESSEMER SYSTEM FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. FISERV SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2019cv00624
Defendant:
FISERV, INC. and FISERV SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
BESSEMER SYSTEM FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WEBER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv02877
Plaintiff:
FRANCES WEBER
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and FISERV, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WASHCO v. HH GREGG et al
as 2:2014cv04579
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WASHCO
Defendant:
HH GREGG and FISERV LENDING SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Data Speed Technology LLC v. Fiserv Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01449
Plaintiff:
Data Speed Technology LLC
Defendant:
Fiserv Inc. and FiServ CIR LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
StrikeForce Technologies Inc. v. PhoneFactor Inc.
as 1:2013cv00490
Defendant:
First Midwest Bancorp Inc., PhoneFactor Inc. and Fiserv Inc.
Petitioner:
Peter S. Tawil
Plaintiff:
StrikeForce Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TradeRisks Inc. v. Fiserv Inc.
as 1:2012cv00971
Plaintiff:
TradeRisks Inc.
Defendant:
Fiserv Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
