Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Dicent v. Sears Holdings et al
as 3:2017cv00778
Plaintiff: Maria Jacqueline Dicent
Defendant: Sears Holdings, Assemblies of God, Edward Scott Lamper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maria Dicent v. Sears Holdings, et al
as 17-1679
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARIA JACQUELINE DICENT
Defendant - Appellee: SEARS HOLDINGS, EDWARD SCOTT LAMPER, DAWN SHERIDAN KOLLOR and others
Dicent v. Sears Holdings et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00332
Plaintiff: Maria Jacqueline Dicent
Defendant: Sears Holdings, Edward Scott Lamper, Dawn Sheridan Kollor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOOD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2016cv07986
Plaintiff: AMY REBECCA WOOD and GEORGE E. WOOD, JR.
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 3:2016md02738
Plaintiff: JAMES CHAKALOS , ADA RICH-WILLIAMS , DOLORES GOULD and others
Defendant: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON , Imerys Talc America Inc and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAADHIO v. CHRISTIE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02599
Plaintiff: RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, JAMES RICHARD "RICK" PERRY, KIMBERLY ANN GUADAGNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv05816
Plaintiff: GEORGE C. WOOD
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv78437
Plaintiff: GEORGE A. WOOD
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant: JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?