Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Woods v. Harry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01052
Defendant: Officer J. Kiner, James Barnacle, Beth Evans and others
Plaintiff: Barry George Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv09304
Plaintiff: GEORGE WOOD and AMY WOOD
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Warden SCI Houtzdale, et al
as 11-3858
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE WOODS
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE, DA DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05598
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURI et al v. MAIN STREET ADOPTION SERVICES, LLP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv03761
Plaintiff: GUY TURI , MELISSA BALISTRERI-TURI , SHAUN NUGENT and others
Defendant: MAIN STREET ADOPTION SERVICES, LLP, NINA HELLER, BOB MCCLENAGHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
WOODS v. WARDEN, SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2009cv02494
Petitioner: GEORGE WOODS
Respondent: WARDEN, SCI HOUTZDALE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC et al
as 2:2009cv64466
Plaintiff: GEORGE WOOD
Defendant: ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC, ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
WOODS v. MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, et al
as 2:2008cv77444
Plaintiff: GEORGE WOODS
Defendant: MISSISSIPPI RUBBER & SPECIALTY, A-BEST CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?