Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BankUnited NA v. William Scism, et al
as 24-1671
Plaintiff:
BANKUNITED NA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCISM, KAREN SCISM and GC OF VINELAND LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN CORRAL CORP and GOLDEN CORRAL FRANCHISING SYSTEMS INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Golden Corral Franchising Systems, Inc. v. GC of Vineland, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02994
Plaintiff:
Golden Corral Franchising Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Karen L. Scism, GC OF VINELAND, LLC. and William J. Scism
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANK UNITED, NA. v. FIRST CHATHAM BANK et al
as 2:2018cv12879
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
William Scism, GC of Vineland, Karen Scism and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION, Golden Corrall Franchising System and GOLDEN CORRAL FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
Bank United and BANK UNITED, NA.
Defendant:
First Chatham Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NEAGLEY v. GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv02544
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN NEAGLEY
Defendant:
GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION and GOLDEN CORRAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HINTERLEITER et al v. GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HINTERLEITER and SHAWN CLICK
Defendant:
GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
