Cases 1 - 10 of 65
LYNCH v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mr. PETER J LYNCH
Defendant:
Atty Tanisha Bailey-Roka and Atty Kathryn Anne Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GAGE v. BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I GAGE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, KEITH J. LYNCH and WILLIAM F. WALDRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Gage v. Keith Lynch, et al
as 23-1168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. LYNCH, construction official and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
Morin v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Edward Morin
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
WHITFIELD v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT COMPANY, JOHN J LYNCH, JR., LAWRENCE K FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
LYNCH v. BROOMALL OPERATING COMPANY LP et al
as 2:2021cv03924
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P LYNCH and JOHN J. LYNCH, SR.
Defendant:
BROOMALL OPERATING COMPANY LP, BROOMALL OPERATING GP LLC, SAVASENIORCARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAGE v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2020cv16236
Defendant:
KEITH J. LYNCH and BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE NIKOLA CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2020cv01277
Defendant:
Jeff Ubben, Gerrit Marx, Mark Russell and others
Nominal Defendant:
Nikola Corporation
Plaintiff:
Hyeyoung Byun, Cynthia M. Langford, Prahant Salguocar and others
LYNCH v. OWENS ILLINOIS
as 2:2020cv60011
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
