Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
MOORE v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOORE
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILLIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Iorio v. MOORE
as 2:2021cv00911
Plaintiff:
Brandon Iorio
Defendant:
JAMES MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MOORE v. EXCAVATING et al
as 2:2020cv10253
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOORE
Defendant:
BRYDAN EXCAVATING and VALTER PEIXOTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
MOORE v. EXCAVATING et al
as 3:2020cv10253
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOORE
Defendant:
BRYDAN EXCAVATING and VALTER PEIXOTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
MOORE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv21160
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOORE and THE ESTATE OF MARIANNE MOORE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRAMPTON v. INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2019cv04317
Plaintiff:
CARL FRAMPTON
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
JAMES MOORE and JAIME MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PURO-TEC, LTD. v. CAROTENUTO et al
as 2:2018cv04546
Defendant:
ARMM CONSULTANTS, INC., JAMES CAROTENUTO, CITY RESTORATION LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PURO-TEC, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
MOORE v. YACKIEL et al
as 3:2018cv00600
Plaintiff:
James Moore
Defendant:
Christopher Yackiel, Michael Moclock, Nicole Boguslaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. YACKIEL et al
as 2:2018cv00965
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOORE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER YACKIEL, MICHAEL MOCLOCK, NICOLE BOGUSLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
