Cases 1 - 10 of 32
David Carpenter v. Mike Barton, et al
as 24-2898
Defendant:
CYNTHIA A. BARTON, JOHN DAVID YOUNG, JR., NIKOLAUS HOHENADEL LLP and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARPENTER
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 24-2843
Respondent:
JAMERA SIRMANS, STEPHEN ZEGAR, JORGE SANTOS and others
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
J.B.C v. Athens Area School District et al
as 4:2024cv01249
Defendant:
Craig J. Stage, ED.D, Christopher Mitchell, William Clark and others
Plaintiff:
J.B.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 24-2104
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
CHRISTINE P. O'HEARN, RENEE M. BUMB, CATHY L. WALDOR and others
BROWN v. YOUNGE
as 2:2023cv04499
Plaintiff:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES JUDGE JOHN MILTON YOUNGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerald BushIn re: Gerald Bush
as 23-2272
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Goverment and RDA, PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and JOHN M. YOUNGE
Young v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
John L. Young
Respondent:
Warden S. Ceresini and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANTIAGO v. YOUNG
as 2:2023cv01815
Petitioner:
MANUEL SANTIAGO
Respondent:
JOHN A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARPENTER v. YOUNG JR.
as 3:2022cv01483
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
JOHN DAVID YOUNG JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv07614
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
LISA DIXON YOUNG and JOHN WILLIAM YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.