Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LAGUERRE v. COOPER et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
JAMES LAGUERRE
Defendant:
JOHN COOPER and JOHN DOES 1-10 (The latter names being fictitious and used to connote an unidentified person responsible for this occurrence)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LAGUERRE v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
JAMES LAGUERRE
Defendant:
JOHN COOPER and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
GILMORE v. COOPER et al
as 2:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
NIKKOEL GILMORE
Defendant:
JOHN COOPER, PLANET LOGISTICS, INC. and MILLER AUTO LEASING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES V. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv21630
Defendant:
DETECTIVE THOMAS RICE, SHERRIFF K9 OFFICER SHANNON SWEENEY, OFFICER KENNETH MCGARRY and others
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Seeba et al
as 1:2016cv02073
Plaintiff:
John Cooper
Defendant:
Jason Seeba, Hess, Klorster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Frank Thompson
as 14-4512
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK THOMPSON, aka JOHN COOPER, aka HANK THOMPSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Cooper v. State of Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-4305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI and DORZINSKY, Business Mgr. at S.C.I.F.
Cooper v. State Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2013cv02153
Plaintiff:
John Cooper
Defendant:
State Of Pennsylvania, Tritt and Dorzinsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
