Cases 1 - 10 of 221
EL et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
REGINA CAMP EL, HARUN BEY, AHMARI CAMP BEY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, SCOTT SCHUBERT, JOHN FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. WAWA, INC.
as 2:2019cv06179
Plaintiff:
JOHN FISHER
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Respondent:
JEFFREY BAUMANN, KELLY EMERY, NICHOLAS RAPAK and others
Petitioner:
Mrs. Tabitha Hans-Arroyo
IN RE WAWA, INC. DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
as 2:2019cv06019
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RAPAK, SCOTT PECK, Mrs. Tabitha Hans-Arroyo and others
In Re:
WAWA, INC. DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ari Bailey, et al
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
John Wetzel, John Fisher, L. OIiver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. PA Dept. of Corr. et al
as 4:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corr., John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Fisher et al
as 1:2014cv02133
Plaintiff:
Juan House
Defendant:
John Fisher, Abrashoff, J.M. Householder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Fisher et al
as 1:2014cv01732
Plaintiff:
Juan House
Defendant:
John Fisher, Jay Whitesel, Lonnie Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections, John Wetzel, John Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. FISHER et al
as 2:2014cv00080
Petitioner:
JONATHAN D. LITTLE
Respondent:
JOHN FISHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
