Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lake v. Ellis et al
as 1:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Lake
Defendant:
Herman Ellis, Angela L. DeBenedictis, Darralyn Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrell Hines v. Joseph Stauffer, et al
as 15-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRELL TAYLOR HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH R. STAUFFER, Prosecutor, CHRISTOPHER CRUZ, Detective Supervisor, JOHN GILL, Lead Detective and others
HINES v. JOHN DOE et al
as 5:2015cv02628
Plaintiff:
TYRELL TAYLOR HINES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOSEPH R. STAUFFER, CHRISTOPHER CRUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ-DIAZ v. OVERIEM et al
as 1:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANGEL VASQUEZ-DIAZ
Defendant:
JOHN OVERIEM, DAVID CULVER and JOHN GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLONDEL et al v. AMERICAN MORTGAGE NETWORK, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05614
Plaintiff:
MCINTYRE BLONDEL , DOREEN BLONDEL , MATT ANDREACCIO and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. , SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
GILL v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57421
Plaintiff:
JOHN GILL
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GILL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49593
Plaintiff:
JOHN GILL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GILL v. RADCLIFF MATERIAL INC.
as 2:2011cv48273
Plaintiff:
JOHN GILL
Defendant:
RADCLIFF MATERIAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Warren v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00653
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Warren
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Michael Deloy, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Christopher Klien, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
