Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NEFF et al v. DAVCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv05537
Plaintiff:
MICHELE NEFF and MARC NEFF
Defendant:
DAVCO CONSTRUCTION, INC., BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESERVICES FOX & ROACH REALTORS, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-3 and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
D&T POOLS LLC agent of d/b/a D&T POOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Alston v. Harry et al
as 1:2018cv02331
Defendant:
Mr. George Clements, John or Jane Doe 1-3, John Horner and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2018cv00028
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , JAKIR HOSSAIN, USAA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MARIJEAN HAMILTON and CLAY TIDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
B.L. v. Lamas et al
as 3:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
B.L.
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas , Steven Glunt , Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abney v. Younker et al
as 1:2013cv01418
Plaintiff:
Clarence Abney
Defendant:
Caleb Younker, Robert Brooks, Nathan Lehman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haugh et al v. S&S Limousines, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01229
Plaintiff:
Patrick Haugh, Daphne Haugh and Elizabeth Haugh
Defendant:
S&S Limousines, Inc., S&S Limo Service, Inc., Marilou O Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
WELH v. MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02873
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH WELH
Defendant:
MANFREDI TRANSPORTATION, CO., INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WILKERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv02172
Plaintiff:
DONTA WILKERSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-3, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
