Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ESTATE OF JULIE S. WHITE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv04451
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JULIE S. WHITE and W. WOODS DOSTER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ken Swenson, et al v. Clyde Vedder, et al
as 22-2330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN SWENSON, CINDY CARD, LADONNA CARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE CLYDE W. VEDDER, In Official Capacity, Court of Common Pleas of York County, ERIK D. SPURLIN, Attorney, MPL Law firm, and in individual capacity, JULIE S. FERNANDEZ, Attorney, Finkel & Fernandez, LLP and in individual capacity Finkel & Fernandez, LLP and others
In re: In the Matter of Ella Card
as 22-2329
Plaintiff / Appellee:
In re: ELLA CARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY CARD, LADONNA CARD, KEN SWENSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS TURNER, President of the Vera Institute, JOHN HOLTZ, Attorney for teh Vera Institute, KIMBERLY GEORGE, Director of the Vera Institute and others
BIEDERMAN v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01459
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION, RANDALL S. DEARTH, J. RICH ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mitchell v. Calgon Carbon Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01572
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mitchell
Defendant:
Calgon Carbon Corporation, Randall S. Dearth, Timothy Glenn Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ASSAD v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ASSAD
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION , J. RICH ALEXANDER , RANDALL S. DEARTH and others
Mediator:
ARTHUR H. STROYD
Plaintiff_consolidated:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LITWIN v. WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE et al
as 2:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LITWIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM SMOOT ANTLE, III, GEORGE BABICH, JR., STEPHEN N. DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
