Cases 1 - 10 of 512
TRUITT v. WAKEFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv04809
Petitioner:
LAMAR TRUITT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHAD WAKEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STROTHERS v. STUTZ et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Defendant:
OFFICER STUTZ, CHRISTOPHER J. EBNER, BRAD A. SHOEMAKER and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAR STROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. STANGER et al
as 2:2024cv04144
Defendant:
C.O. STANGER and C.O. PEEPLES
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BLACK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv02251
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lamar Haymes v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1926
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI
Plaintiff:
LAMAR HAYMES
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CO 2 BANGER, CO 1 CALLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04422
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD
Respondent:
WARDEN RENEE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Alonzo Johnson
as 24-1527
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
