Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gott v. Yelland et al
as 3:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Tysheen Gott
Defendant:
Shane Yelland, Larry Whitehead and F.B.I. T.F.O. Scranton Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward McLaughlin v. Todd Henry, et al
as 19-2643
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. HARDING, Task Force Officer, JUDGE A. RICHARD CAPUTO, TODD E. HENRY, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD MCLAUGHLIN
MCLAUGHLIN v. HENRY et al
as 1:2019cv09451
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, TIMOTHY HANDING, TODD EDWARD HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Reynolds v. USA, et al
as 14-4163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FBI JOSEPH NOONE and FBI LARRY WHITEHEAD
Reynolds v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01733
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Noone and Larry Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Reynolds v. Larry Whitehead, et al
as 11-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, FBI and JOSEPH NOONE, FBI
Michael Reynolds v. USA, et al
as 11-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN GURGANUS, Prosecutor, LARRY WHITEHEAD, FBI Affiant and others
Reynolds v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv02602
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America, John Gurganus, Larry Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2010cv02044
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant:
Larry Whitehead, Joseph Neone and US Marshal, unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Reynolds v. Joseph Noone
as 10-3813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY WHITEHEAD, FBI and JOSEPH NOONE, FBI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
