Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Foster et al v. Argentieri
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Foster, Jr. and April L. Foster
Defendant:
Emmanuel J. Argentieri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
FOSTER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12993
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
DIANNE M. FOSTER and DEAN E. FOSTER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VEGA v. BARNACLE et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Defendant:
J. BARNACLE, J. MCCELLEND, SCI SOMERSET PSYCH DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER VEGA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEGA v. BARNACLE et al
as 3:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
WALTER VEGA, JR.
Defendant:
J. BARNACLE, A. WINGARD, MCDAMMELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11173
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. FOSTER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOSTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2016cv05299
Plaintiff:
ARFIENIA M. FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FOSTER v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66979
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. FOSTER
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOSTER et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34544
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. FOSTER and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
