Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Farida Rahman v. Richard Hughes, III
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
FARIDA B. RAHMAN
Defendant:
RICHARD M. HUGHES, III
Rahman v. Hughes
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Richard M. Hughes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahman v. Hughes
as 3:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Richard M. Hughes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonello Boldrini v. Ktt, et al
as 22-3015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant:
KTT, Jane Doe, personally in her official capacity of Director of Operations, SIEDEL, John Doe (D), personally and in his official capacity as U.S. Marshal Guard, CHRIS HILL, U.S.M. 2019-2022, personally and his official capacity as USM Detective and others
Antonello Boldrini v. Ktt, et al
as 22-8050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant:
CHRIS HILL, U.S.M.2019-2022 personally and in his official capacity as USM Detective, ROBERT D. MARIANI, personally and in his official capacity as Judge, MALACHY E. MANNION, personally and in his official capacity of Judge and others
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COWAN v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN COWAN
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JERMINE JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv20161
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, MEDICAL DEPT. STAFF, NURSE NANCY GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2021cv20147
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES and WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
