Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mitchell v. Makin Movez, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Benita Mitchell
Defendant:
Makin Movez, LLC and Robert C Haspel, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Motor Vehicle
MAKINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14131
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MAKINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MAKIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11070
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MAKIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stockton v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01306
Defendant:
D.J. Close, C.O. M. Miller, Knowles and others
Not Yet Classified:
C.O. Lancass
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hockenberry v. PA Parole & Probation Commissioners Office et al
as 1:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
Jason Hockenberry
Defendant:
PA Parole & Probation Commissioners Office, Tammy L. Hunter, Barbara A. Clare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONWAY et al v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA et al
as 2:2015cv03963
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. CONWAY , COREY MUSSELMAN , THE SAN ANTONIO ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP, L.L.P. and others
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA, ANTHEM, INC., HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
RVN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. MAKIN FUN, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03388
Plaintiff:
RVN ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
MAKIN FUN, INC., GLENMONT RR CROSSING, LLC and JEFFREY APPEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
